STAFF ACCESS

Sign in to review evidence

Local development authority. Use a configured reviewer or recruiter account.

UsernamePassword

RESEARCH · REVIEW · OWNER HANDOFF

Find your next contractors

Describe who you need. Get researched business profiles ready for a reviewer.

STEP 1 · FIND CANDIDATES

Find candidates

Find businesses online, review their evidence, then add candidates to your research queue.

1. Brief Tell us what good looks like
2. Research We identify businesses and gather evidence
3. Review Accept or deny on one business profile

Search source

Checking candidate sources…

Criteria briefDescribe business requirements only. These criteria are used for public web research.TradeZIP code

HUMAN REVIEW

Review candidates

Saved business profiles, evidence and decisions. Accept approves a research shortlist, not contractor activation.

PLAN · SUPPLY BRIEF

Supply briefs

A brief fixes the trade, precise area, desired services, target capacity, source budget and review policy. Candidate counts are research work only; current local supply stays unknown until an owner supplies evidence.

SYNTHETIC STAFF INTAKE

Source and batch intake

A reviewer records source rights. Staff preview selected JSON rows before a separate commit. Similar names are warnings, never business matches.

Register source

Source titleReferenceRights and use note

Observed atPermission expires

Processing of this synthetic source is allowed

Preview JSON batch

Registered sourceSupply brief (optional)JSON rows

1–20 rows. Each needs an external ID, scope and 1–5 evidence items dated within the source permission window.

STEP 5 · VERIFICATION POLICY

Requirement policies

A reviewer records the applicable trade and jurisdiction requirements as a versioned policy, then applies one to a case. A policy lists what must be checked and which authority owns it; it decides nothing by itself.

Policy titleVersion

TradeJurisdiction

Requirement items (JSON)

1–25 items. Each needs a key, label, responsible authority, scope note and whether a current validity date is required.

OPERATIONS · MEASURES

Operations scorecard

Cohort

Every available measure shows its numerator and denominator. Measures that depend on owner evidence, a cost feed or human grading are listed as unavailable with what blocks them. None of them is reported as zero.

Analysis budget

The ceilings this deployment enforces on analysis jobs, and what the current window has used. Spend is not metered inside ProScout: an amount is explicitly reported by the foundation, estimated by the foundation, or estimated from the configured cost per job. Each analysis records which; an estimate is not a measured charge. Ceilings are configuration standing for PS-01 decision 09.

Analysis attribution

Which model produced each conclusion. The shared execution foundation is becoming multi-provider, so a withdrawn model can only be scoped to the cases it actually touched if every analysis says what ran. Analyses that do not say so are listed as unattributed, never folded into a model that happens to be configured.

STEP 8 · RECHECKS AND CORRECTIONS

Due rechecks and corrections

Horizon

Work that is due now or soon, computed from current evidence, source permission and reviewer decisions. Nothing here extends a validity date, revives an expired conclusion or changes another owner's record.

ACCESS · PERMISSIONS

What this build lets you do

The permission set the server enforces, and which PS-01 decision governs each one. Holding a permission means this build lets your role act; it is not an owner approval. A narrower set, and a real identity provider, are PS-01 decision 03.

Refused attempts

Every action this tenant refused, most recent first. Request bodies, evidence text and query strings are never recorded.

MODEL EVALUATION · GRADING RULES

Evaluation rubric

How a model is graded against synthetic evaluation fixtures, served from the file an operator edits. The grading validator reads the same file, so these rules are the rules applied. This grades a model, not a business: it is never filled in per contractor and no contractor sees it.

Verdicts

Dispositions

What a reviewer records for a case once its fields are graded. A disposition that requires every field to pass is refused while any field is failed or not applicable.

Rules

Recorded grades

What reviewers have recorded against this rubric, grouped by the model that produced the run. A field no grade covered is listed as never graded, not as a pass, and runs nobody has graded are listed as outstanding. These counts are evidence toward a model qualification decision, not the decision.

Ungraded synthetic runs

Candidate queue

Supply briefStatusAssignee Open research work only

Bulk assignment

Selected cases can be reassigned after a preview of the effect. There is no bulk review, identity decision, verification or owner action.

Assign selected to

Select a case

Start a synthetic research packet or open one saved earlier.

Find your next contractors

Find candidates

Review candidates

Supply briefs

Source and batch intake

Register source

Preview JSON batch

Requirement policies

Operations scorecard

Analysis budget

Analysis attribution

Due rechecks and corrections

What this build lets you do

Refused attempts

Evaluation rubric

Verdicts

Dispositions

Rules

Recorded grades

Ungraded synthetic runs

Select a case

Create a supply brief

Create a synthetic case

Research brief

Source evidence

Add synthetic source text

Analysis

Identity resolution

Services and service area

Service area

Verification review

Owner handoff

Corrections

Human correction

Human research review

Model evaluation grade

History